Abstract:
This paper examines the correlation between the lexicon and argumentative communication , by putting forward the idea and its goal, and defining concepts and starting points, to clarify the common features between the two parties: the lexicon and the argumentation. The idea is clarified more and more when the research offers a study of actual applications reflect manifestations of this correlation in its two axes and in levels of the second axis. And the idea is clarified also in reviewing the forms of lexical argumentative communicative texts - and selecting five forms from them – and locating placements and forms of the arguments, which included in the lexicon, either in its prefaces or its texts which include pure linguistic issues (verbal, morphological, grammatical, and prosodic issues), and questions of protest and sources of "Quran", poetry, and "Hadith"... etc, and also non-linguistic issues which texts include. All of the above reveals the lexical impact in the argumentation at times, and the argumentative impact in the lexicon at other times, and this deepens when foreseeing a set of deductive patterns which argumentative hierarchies secrete in their circulations. Thus, this matter confirms what the research goes to that there are important joint operations between the lexicon and the argumentation.
